GMAT critical reasoning diagnostic test Take this diagnostic test and let us know your scores. We can have a counselling session based on this data. Book your counselling session by filling this formGMAT critical reasoning testNumber of questions 5Duration 10 minsClick the answer option One food writer wrote that reducing the amount of animal products in one's diet can contribute to better health and well-being. Based on this claim, some people are completely eliminating meat from their diets in order to be healthier. The argument above relies on which of the following assumptions? Increasing the amount of vegetables and grains in one's diet can contribute to better health. There will be no corresponding increase in the amount of dairy products in the diets of those who are eliminating meat. Most food writers believe that some amount of animal products is necessary to a health diet. Not all healthy lifestyles require a vegetarian diet. Many people who do not eat animal products make decisions for health reasons. Studies reveal that a daily exercise regimen helps stroke survivors regain dexterity in their extremities. Being given an exercise routine and having a consultation with a doctor about the exercise routine have been shown to be effective mechanisms to get patients to exercise daily. From the above information, which of the following statements can be reasonably inferred? A stroke survivor that is given a detailed exercise plan and consults her physician about the plan will regain full dexterity in her extremities If a stroke survivor is not given an exercise plan and does not consult with a doctor, she will not regain dexterity in her extremities. Stroke survivors who are given an exercise routine and consult with a doctor about that routine will sometimes regain dexterity in their extremities. Being given an exercise routine and having a consultation with a doctor about the routine is the best way to help a stroke survivor regain dexterity in their extremities. Only being given an exercise routine is necessary to regenerate dexterity in the extremities of seniors who have suffered a stroke. Farmer: Worldwide, just three grain crops—rice, wheat, and corn—account for most human caloric intake. To maintain this level of caloric intake and also keep pace with global population growth, yields per acre from each of these crops will have to increase at least 1.5 percent every year, given that the supply of cultivated land is diminishing. Therefore, the government should increase funding for research into new ways to improve yields. Which of the following is an assumption on which the farmer's argument depends? It is solely the government's responsibility to ensure that the amount of rice, wheat, and corn produced worldwide keeps pace with global population growth. Increasing government funding for research into new ways to improve the yields per acre of rice, wheat, and corn crops would help to increase total worldwide annual production of food from these crops. Increasing the yields per acre of rice, wheat, and corn is more important than increasing the yields per acre of other crops. Current levels of funding for research into ways of improving grain crop yields per acre have enabled grain crop yields per acre to increase by more than 1.5 percent per year worldwide. In coming decades, rice, wheat, and corn will become a minor part of human caloric intake, unless there is government-funded research to increase their yields per acre. Some people say that the scarcity of food is a function of the finite limits of the earth’s resources, coupled with a relentless rate of population growth. This analysis fails to recognize, however, that much of the world’s agricultural resources are used to feed livestock instead of people. In the United States, for example, almost one-half of the agricultural acreage is devoted to crops fed to livestock. A steer reduces twenty-one pounds of inexpensive grain to one pound of expensive meat. Thus, the scarcity of food is not merely a function of limited resources and population growth. Which one of the following is an assumption that would allow the conclusion in the argument to be properly drawn? People prefer eating meat to eating grain. Meat is twenty-one times more expensive than grain. The limits of the earth’s agricultural resources are not finite. More than one-half of the agricultural acreage in the United States is devoted to crops fed to humans. Growing crops for human consumption on the acreage currently devoted to crops for livestock will yield more food for more people. Any serious policy discussion about use of the phrase ‘energetic disassembly’ instead. In fact, the word ‘explosion’ elicits desirable reactions, such as a heightened level of attention, whereas the substitute phrase does not. Therefore, of the two terms, ‘explosion’ is the one that should be used throughout discussions of this sort. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends? In the kind of discussion at issue, the advantages of desirable reactions to the term ‘explosion’ outweigh the drawbacks, if any, arising from undesirable reactions to that term. The phrase ‘energetic disassembly’ has not so far been used as a substitute for the word ‘explosion’ in the kind of discussion at issue. In any serious policy discussion, what is said by the participants is more important than how it is put into words. The only reason that people would have for using ‘energetic disassembly’ in place of ‘explosion’ is to render impossible any serious policy discussion concerning explosions. The phrase ‘energetic disassembly’ is not necessarily out of place in describing a controlled rather than an accidental explosion. 1 out of 5 Time is Up! Time's up What next? Do a math diagnostic test here Do a reading comprehension diagnostic test here Click here to know about our 1. classroom courses2. online live sessions Share Follow Share Share